Arizona legislators are joining a national trend to limit the use of drones manufactured by DJI, the Chinese drone giant, due to security concerns linked to its origins. Senate Bill 1500, while not naming DJI explicitly, seeks to prohibit state public agencies from purchasing or using drones produced by companies based in, or affiliated with, countries deemed as security threats, including China.
This initiative is part of a broader effort across the United States to reduce reliance on DJI drones, which dominate the market, amid escalating tensions between the US and China. Critics of the bill argue that such measures, while aimed at protecting national security, may also serve protectionist purposes, potentially benefiting US drone manufacturers by excluding the market leader.
The proposed Arizona law follows the example of similar legislation enacted in Florida last year, which led public service agencies to invest over $25 million in US-made drones as replacements. With DJI drones widely used by law enforcement and emergency services in Arizona, a similar ban could impose significant financial burdens on state taxpayers.
Critics, including Democrat Christine Marsh, who voted against the bill, highlight the practical implications of such restrictions, noting the potential impact on essential services like police departments, which rely on drones for search and rescue operations and aerial surveillance.
Moreover, the bill's focus on "critical components" from listed countries could inadvertently affect American drone makers dependent on Chinese parts, potentially limiting their ability to sell within Arizona.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, it reflects the complex balance between national security concerns and the practical implications for drone use in public services, as well as the broader drone industry landscape.